Independent tests show why Orgs should use third -party cloud safety services

Companies do not always get what they pay in cybersecurity. Some of the most expensive sellers of the cloud protection wall are among the worst performers against exploits and editing, according to the most independent tests conducted by Cyberraratings.org so far.

CISCO, to the extent the most expensive wall protection wall from the cloud network provided by the 10 best sellers on the price per mg per second, ranked seventh with a total security event of 53.5 %, according to the Cyberrarses.org search on Wednesday.

The trio of large cloud service providers – Amazon, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform – was worse, every drop at the bottom of the package with a score of 0 % safety.

“We have been told to use the original cloud technologies, and they are more convenient than using Bolt-ons. Well, this is not the case here,” Vikram Phatak, CEO of Cyberrarses.org told Cyberscooop.

He said: “Which of the third -party protection walls you choose will be better in protecting you more than today with the AWS wall, but also frankly AZURE and GCP today as well.”

Fortinet and Check Point got the highest rating of 100 %, followed by Versa networks, Palo Alto networks and Juniper networks – every landing at the upper end of 99, according to Cyberraratings.org tests. The level of security effective in forcePoint was 96.6 %.

Cyberraratings.org was tested on the walls of the cloud network protection for more than 2000 widely exploited weaknesses. Change, which prompted tests and research in the first quarter of 2025 without any participation in the seller, then applied 2,500 attacks that extend 27 technologies evading multiple networks to overcome the defenses of the Wall protection.

“This is what I consider to be an equivalent to the open book test. It is not very difficult things,” said Vaact.

He said: “We want to know what the buyer and buyer can rely on it in an aggressive situation, as things do not always go on their way.” “This is not a hurricane of 5 category, and it is not a sunny day on the beach.”

Cyberrarses.org tests showed wide variations in the ability of the walls of the cloud network to defense in exchange for exploits available to the public. The protection of organizations is from the exploitation of the first line of defense, which is a basic sale point and a purpose of the walls of protection.

AWS performed the worst on this front, and it was banned only 0.59 % of the exploits. Fatak said that the big problem for AWS is that her signing of non -identical clothes.

“If you put all your eggs in the AWS basket, you will unfortunately end up from the cybersecurity perspective at least.”

Upon approximation at the bottom of the field, Microsoft Azure prevented 55.28 %, prohibited Cisco 90.68 %, prohibited GCP 96.6 % and prohibited CorePoint 97.63 % of the exploits. Fortinet and Check Point prohibited all the exploits of the Cyberraratings.org he delivered in the cloud network protection walls. Versa Networks, Juniper Networks and Palo Alto Networks are recorded in 99 high when the exploitation prevention.

The total results and classifications diverged more when Cyberrarses.org measured the performance of the walls of the cloud network for harmony.

CISCO, AWS, GCP and Microsoft Azure failed to defend against the tactics of evading layer 3 and layer 7, network movement that arises from IP addresses and application data content.

Ultimately, the score of the effectiveness of the security was 0 % applied to AWS and GCP due to the ease of which exceeded the Cyberraratings.org their protection walls. Both sellers got 0 % in harmony.

Microsoft's performance was better than its cloud counterparts on Evasions, where it recorded 78 %. However, the “big problem” of Microsoft is that if anything coded with https appears, they are blind. (It is) the only protection wall that does not have a built -in HTTPS decoder. ”

Microsoft (TLS) and the support of the SML (SSL) has led to its total effectiveness by 0 %, according to the criteria of Cyberraratings.org. Cisco has prevented 59 % of Cyberraratings.org.

ForcePoint prevented 99 % of harmony, while Palo Alto, Check Point, Junier Networks and Versa Networks were 100 %, according to Cyberraratings.org tests.

Cyberraratings.org has explained its test frame, including the reason and the extent to which points of the protection wall sellers are allocated in all the tested groups. In many cases, the combination of exploitation and evasion tests, and other unique factors for specific factors that led to a decrease in the degrees of security effectiveness.

In the case of AWS, the wall of protection did not prevent any live attacks, so Cyberrars.org was unable to test it against harmony. With the Microsoft Wall, Cyberraratings.org escape from the defenses by encrypting traffic or targeting encrypted web server.

Fatak's harsh criticism on AWS, which was constantly poorly performed in Cyberrarses.org Exploitation tests. He said: “The Amazon's lack of improvement was shocking to us.” “He only says he does not take this seriously.”